An analysis of socratess philosophy

Socrates addressed some words to the court for his defense. He is accused of impiety and corrupting the young. Is he guilty or not guilty? And if guilty, what penalty should we impose?

An analysis of socratess philosophy

Is something good because it is approved, because it benefits someone, or because it has the intrinsic qualities of goodness?

Plato and Socrates' Apology (Summary)

Something is good because it is approved. Something is good because it benefits someone.

An analysis of socratess philosophy

Something is good because it is intrinsically good. Throughout Plato's critique and review of philosophical dilemmas, it often seems as though he speaks through the voice of Socrates' himself.

A further example of Plato's thought experiments being verbalized by his muse, Socrates, is found in my analysis of Plato's Republic. What's important to realize is that the question of whether Socrates was a real character in history, or whether Socrates was a projection of Plato's mind bears little importance when analyzing Plato's overall work and thought experiments.

So, without further ado, let's begin. Next, I will explain the difference between "the gods loving the pious because it is pious" and "the pious being pious because the gods love it". Finally, I will give my opinion as to what I think the pious can be explained as. Source The Form of Piety and Holiness: Eidos To begin, Socrates urges Euthyphro to examine his ideals of what piety or holiness are.

Euthyphro concludes that what is holy is what all gods agree upon, and that which is not agreed upon is unholy. This, however, perplexes Socrates, because it seems that there are disputes among the gods as the what is deemed right or pious.

What Socrates wants to understand is the form of holy. The form of holy would have to be the same in all instances. After, Euthyphro needs further explanation. Socrates explains the difference by stating that being approved is an example either of coming to be so or of being affected by something.

So, if the gods unanimously agreed on one thing being holy, it would be holy because they say so, not because it is holy in form. On the other hand, there can be something that is holy, yet all of the gods might not agree upon it.

In this case, those who do not agree would be mistaken, since they would be rejecting the true form of holy; a form outside of the gods themselves.

Source Do the Gods Benefit from Piety? After some thought, Euthyphro comes up with a response to what Socrates has just posited. Euthyphro says that holiness is the part of justice which looks after the gods.

So, Socrates then makes the comparison and analogy of other services, such as shipbuilders achieving the creation of boats. This shows that services create a multitude of good things for those who partake in such endeavors. Socrates points out that this may also be a problem, because it is not the fact that whenever you do things that are holy, you are improving the gods in some way.May 21,  · The Immortal Soul: An Analysis of Phaedo Posted on May 21, May 21, by Miguel A.

Tovar This is a lengthy philosophical paper I wrote concerning one of Plato’s dialogues, “Phaedo,” in which he recounts Socrates’ final hours after Socrates was condemned by the Athenian court to die by drinking the poisonous .

His works on philosophy, politics and mathematics were very influential and laid the foundations for Euclid’s systematic approach to mathematics. Gorgias is a dialogue in which Plato sets the rhetorician Gorgias in opposition to the philosopher Socrates; Plato’s mentor.

Gorgias was a Sicilian philosopher, orator, and rhetorician. Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury.

His works on philosophy, politics and mathematics were very influential and laid the foundations for Euclid’s systematic approach to mathematics. Gorgias is a dialogue in which Plato sets the rhetorician Gorgias in opposition to the philosopher Socrates; Plato’s mentor. Gorgias was a Sicilian philosopher, orator, and rhetorician. Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for bringing Socrates before the jury. This is the only instance in The Apology of the elenchus, or cross-examination, which is so central to most Platonic dialogues. His works on philosophy, politics and mathematics were very influential and laid the foundations for Euclid’s systematic approach to mathematics. Gorgias is a dialogue in which Plato sets the rhetorician Gorgias in opposition to the philosopher Socrates; Plato’s mentor. Gorgias was a Sicilian philosopher, orator, and rhetorician.

This is the only instance in The Apology of the elenchus, or cross-examination, which is so central to most Platonic dialogues. The Socrates of the dialogues is enduringly amusing: witty, occasionally droll and puckish, sometimes caustic in his analysis of any topic attempted and its attendant arguments; Socrates causes the dialogues to flourish through the centuries.

Analysis Of Platos Theory Of Knowledge Philosophy Essay. Many of Plato's ideas and theories were largely influenced by his mentor, Socrates, including his theories of knowledge and education. He advocates, through Socrates, the belief that knowledge is not a matter of study, learning or observation, but a matter of recollection.

An analysis of socratess philosophy

Mar 24,  · An Analysis of Piety in Plato's "Euthyphro" Updated on April 3, JourneyHolm. more. This, too, is not sufficient for Socrates’ analysis of piety. So, Socrates then makes the comparison and analogy of other services, such as shipbuilders achieving the creation of boats.

Philosophy. An Analysis of Socrates' View on the Form of the Reviews: 3.

Analysis of the Apology